What the patents claim
Claim 1 of US 11,664,123 is a wearable activity device with a display, an accelerometer or biometric sensor, wireless circuitry and memory holding wireless pairing information. The device generates a color-coded scannable code from the pairing information and shows it on its display. It establishes the wireless link once a mobile device has scanned and decoded the code, and then sends activity or biometric data to the mobile device.
Claim 1 of US 12,230,394 is the phone side. The phone opens an optical scanning interface, uses its camera to read a color-coded code from the wearable’s display, obtains the pairing information, establishes the link and displays the activity or biometric data it receives.
What we found
Samsung’s US 8,116,685 (January 2010) pairs two wireless devices visually. Software on the device with a screen generates an image that graphically encodes unique one-time connection information. The second device captures the image with its camera, decodes it, and uses the information to open a Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connection.
Bosch’s US 8,970,733 (May 2010) displays a tag on one device’s screen that is associated with information stored on that device. A second device photographs it, recognises it and transfers the information. A dependent claim uses this to replace the standard Bluetooth pairing process.
Kodak’s US 7,912,426 (October 2006) has electronic equipment produce a visual code when activated. Another device reads it and transmits command data over Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. Acumen’s US 2004/0020856 (2003) is a wrist-worn fitness watch with step and lap sensing and a display.
None of these is cited on either patent or across the family (25 references in total).
Why it matters to the defendant
Samsung covers the pairing method in both claims: pairing data encoded in an image on one device’s display, read by the other device’s camera, then used to open the wireless link. The open points are the color coding and the wearable activity tracker. Microsoft’s 2008 application on pairing through encoded color information is already cited on the family, so the examiner had the color idea. Our references add the screen-generated pairing code that the claims build on. Apple’s IPRs on both patents were instituted on October 19, 2026, so these references are most useful as backup art for the district court case.
The answer in Patent Mechanics
The search as it appears in the app, abridged.
| Reference | Assignee | Priority | Citation record | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 8,116,685 | Samsung | 2010 | Not cited | Partial |
| US 8,970,733 | Bosch | 2010 | Not cited | Partial |
| US 7,912,426 | Kodak | 2006 | Not cited | Weak |
| Element | Claim language (abridged) | ’685 | ’733 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1[a] | Wearable with display and activity or biometric sensor | – | – |
| 1[b] | Store wireless pairing information | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1[c] | Generate a color-coded scannable code from it | ? | ? |
| 1[d] | Show the code on the device’s own display | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1[e] | Establish the link after the phone scans the code | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1[f] | Send activity or biometric data to the phone | – | – |
References
| Reference | Title | Priority | Covers | Gaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 8,116,685 | Visual pairing of mobile devices (Samsung) | 2010-01-26 | Screen device generates an image encoding one-time connection information; camera device captures and decodes it; Wi-Fi or Bluetooth link established | Color coding not stated; not a wearable activity tracker |
| US 8,970,733 | Visual pairing and data exchange using barcodes (Bosch) | 2010-05-28 | Tag displayed on one device, photographed by another; replaces Bluetooth pairing | Color coding not stated; not a wearable |
| US 7,912,426 | Production of visual codes for pairing electronic equipment (Kodak) | 2006-10-02 | Equipment produces a visual code on activation; another device reads it; Bluetooth or Wi-Fi | Code carries commands rather than pairing credentials |
Limits of this analysis
- We used the earliest claimed date, the August 2011 provisional, and all references predate it. Whether the wearable claims are supported that early is a separate question.
- Microsoft’s 2008 color-pairing application is already in the citation record. The color-coding limitation therefore rests on art the examiner saw.
- Apple’s IPRs on both patents were instituted on October 19, 2026. Art outside the petitions may still matter in district court.
“Not cited” means the reference does not appear in the examiner or applicant citations of the patent or its family in our index. This article is research, not legal advice, and makes no finding that any claim is invalid.
You can do what’s written in this article, and a lot more, today on Patent Mechanics. Try it with a 7-day free trial, no credit card required.